Tuesday, December 20, 2016

Reflections on semester one

I write this post in Seattle airport as I await my long journey home for Christmas after spending six great days in Washington. As I sit here, I am able to reflect sufficiently upon the past four months I have spent in the United States. There have been definite highs but similarly, there have been lows. I am unable to put everything in words but here are a few things that have stood out for me.

If I am being honest, I am disappointed with UT’s Geography department and it has indeed made me realise how great the department is at UCL. I took three geography classes this semester, in addition to a gender studies class. I felt as if all my classes expected very little of you: the required readings often only repeated what was taught in class, whilst the class content was relatively easy. 
Furthermore, the semester was a total of sixteen weeks (nearly double that of UCL’s) but I did not feel as if I learnt a greater amount that I would normally at UCL. Instead, ideas and concepts were taught more slowly and often, the material became repetitive and boring by the end of the semester.

Exams were not essay based and instead short answer. Therefore, I felt as if I was unable to properly engage in the subject or exercise critical thinking. It sometimes very much felt like school again. Additionally, I read very few academic articles, which was especially disappointing for the class I took about the Anthropocene when it is such a pioneering topic within academic journals. Instead we read non-fiction books that seemed to be aimed for an audience with little environmental science knowledge, which I found dull and slightly patronising.

However, everyone knows that a year abroad is not just about academia; I am hugely thankful for this opportunity and as time goes on, I become even more appreciative. I’ve met so many new people and made friends from different countries and continents. I’ve seen places that I never thought I would see and I’m experiencing a culture that, regardless of the common language, is so very different to that of the UK’s. I have been able to experience Thanksgiving (which basically feels just like a Christmas dinner without the decorations and presents) with family in Wisconsin, witnessed the shock of the presidential election and been part of the disappointed mass, and saw my favourite band whose tour coincidentally came to Texas.

I’ve been incredibly impressed with the university’s facilities: many buildings on the campus are modern builds and have great open spaces to work in, there are multiple cafes, and even specific places to nap. However, the sports facilities are probably the best in my opinion; there are three gyms on campus, an indoor running track, several squash courts, a climbing wall, two pools and even a hot tub, all in addition to renovated sports fields and tennis courts north of campus. I am currently on the women’s Ultimate Frisbee team, Melee, and therefore I am profusely thankful for the gym and fields, especially as UCL’s facilities in this area are arguably very dire in comparison. We practice as a team three times a week in addition to working out/throwing twice a week; we are able to do this due to the facilities that UT provides. I am probably the fittest I’ve been regardless of the amount of American junk food I’ve been eating.

I could write so much more about the experiences and differences I have encountered but I’ll save that for May. However, I would like to include that I have found vegetarian and vegan food in Texas and consequently, I am still sufficiently nourished…  I didn’t know what this first semester would bring but I can now certainly confirm that I do indeed have a soft spot for Austin. I look forward to returning in January and seeing what the remaining four months will bring.  

Finishing the semester in Seattle

Sunday, December 18, 2016

Sustainability on the UT Campus

As time goes on, I continue to learn more and more about UT Austin; some discoveries are positive, and some are negative. However, all are interesting. One such discovery was my visit to the Living Wall with my landscape ecology class; we were assessing how urban areas can attempt to provide new solutions to environmental problems and help meet conservation goals. The Living Wall is the name given to the steel wall that contains a variety of freshly planted native vegetation within a honeycomb structure. The wall consists of 148 interchangeable plastic soil containers that support the numerous root systems and consequently provide habitat for a variety of fauna, including lizards, hummingbirds, and butterflies (Lentz, 2016). The wall was constructed in summer 2016 by the School of Architecture in collaboration with the Lady Bird Johnson Wildflower Center to assess the role of architecture in ecology (Lentz, 2016).

In addition to the aesthetic impact, the wall provides numerous environmental benefits. These include: cooling the building, mitigating storm water, reducing noise pollution, increasing air quality through the removal of certain particulate matter, and providing habitat for native species (Texas Architecture, nd). These impacts are especially significant given the wall’s location – parallel to a busy road. The wall has been received positively, hoping that it will help provide data and understanding into campus sustainability; there is hope that the installation will encourage additional constructions of living walls in other locations on campus (Texas Architecture, nd).

The Living Wall

My visit to the Living Wall made me start to think about the other sustainable spaces on the UT campus and the additional ways the university attempts to achieve sustainability. Before I even arrived in Austin, sustainability was on my mind; I knew from researching the university that the institution upheld certain values and goals, including the provision of sustainability-focused learning and research opportunities for all UT students, the construction of green buildings, the reduction of waste, and the maintenance and restoration of native ecosystems (UT Austin, nd). UT adopted a Campus Sustainability Policy in 2008 and established a Department of Sustainability in 2009 that both aim to promote these sustainable goals across the campus (Office of Sustainability, nd). One of the initiatives I am incredibility impressed with is the university’s microfarm: the urban farm is led by passionate students who grow food and provide education on the benefits of locally grown organic produce to university students and those from the surrounding community.

On the surface, UT seems to certainly tick the sustainability box. Therefore, it is perhaps unsurprising that the university is regarded by The Princeton Review (2016) to be one of the 361 most environmentally friendly colleges. However, there is a part of me that does not agree with this. After studying here for almost four months, I have noticed certain unsustainable practices; the amount of waste produced from paper towels due to the absence of hand dryers in the toilets, the excessive air conditioning throughout campus buildings, the lack of recycling bins in certain locations, the abundance of plastic food packaging in campus cafes, and as an environmental vegetarian, the lack of support and education of meatless meals.

These are predominatly little things, which is what I find particularly interesting; they are arguably the easiest practices to pursue, especially in comparison to a steel construction that has taken extensive time, money, and persuasion. Therefore, I question the university’s intentions. Large and decadent sustainability projects attract attention – attention that grabs prospective students who care about the environment or prestigious environmental awards. I’m not arguing that sustainable practices are purely being implemented only for their desirable consequences, including the potential increase of prospective students and academics, but instead that these consequences are one of the reasons why sustainable practices are pursed by a university.

UT is not unique. Sustainability is currently not the number one priority for a university. I wish that perhaps in the future sustainability may gain a greater hold in the agenda but in the meantime, I hope that the data collected from the Living Wall shows the benefits and consequently, the positives of certain sustainable practices on campus (even though I fundamentally just wish UT installed hand dryers into the toilets).

References
Lentz, S.R. (2016) Campus Installs First Living Wall [Online]. Austin: The University of Texas at Austin. Available at: https://news.utexas.edu/2016/06/20/campus-installs-first-living-wall [Accessed 13 December 2016].

Office of Sustainability (nd) History [Online]. Austin: The University of Texas at Austin. Available at: http://operations.utexas.edu/sustainability/about.html [Accessed 13 December 2016].

Texas Architecture (nd) Visit the Living Wall! [Online]. Austin: The University of Texas at Austin. Available at: http://soa.utexas.edu/headlines/utsoa-announces-living-wall-project [Accessed 13 December 2016].

The Princeton Review (2016) 361 Green Colleges [Online]. Natick: The Princeton Review. Available at: https://www.princetonreview.com/college-rankings?rankings=green-colleges [Accessed 13 December 2016].

University of Texas at Austin (nd) Initiatives [Online]. Austin: The University of Texas at Austin. Available at: https://sustainability.utexas.edu/initiatives/ [Accessed 13 December 2016].